Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | My Orble | Login

Some evolution for democracy

March 31st 2009 07:28
Hey all,

To give some simple examples for starters:

. you want to change your car. Would you ask your kid about advise?
. you want to cook a meal for your girl. Will you ask your rugbymen friends on what should you do?
. you're choosing a place to live in Australia. Would you ask the advise of a Frenchmen?

Please, don't try to distort the thing. I know that we can allways find a kid that dominates the unbelievable things that cars can do today; there's allways a rugbymen that know how to cook; there are some Frenchmen in Australia.

The idea behind is: when you have to take decisions on some matters, you ask the experts. Even if your kid is going to ride the car you're going to buy, he's not to take a part of the decision, or at least your going to make a ponderation on his opinions.

The same goes for the hole society. Today we elect people who sometimes is completely incapable of taking decisions in some matters, and worst, they don't even want to learn. Democracy is a good step towards a equalitarian society, but now we should start checking the problems on it.

As Nietzsche used to say, democracy is the magnification of mediocraty. In the way we're organised today, we have to admit, it's true.

So after some good discussions with my girlfriend, I got to a set of rules that should make our society rule better:

- define a "recours aux experts" following some rules to avoid oligarchies to dominate:
. the ensemble who is considered expert is the most educated 1/X of the population in a specific matter
. there are Y different domains of expertise, and a member of population cannot be a part of more of Y/Z domains of expertise.

- Harmonise the access to education (it means that if there is something that the state must be responsible of is education) so that there is no discrepancies in the meritology. Today it is easy for rich kids to talk about merit, they went to study in the best schools, so there is no competition for them..if you want to have an equal society with "recours aux experts", this is a major point.

X, Y and Z are integers that have to be less than 10:
- X have to be less than 10 to avoid that too small groups dominate society.
- Y to avoid complexity of the organisation
- Z to avoid that one person be part of all decisions, but that some people have more domains of expertise than others.

I'll try to discuss more about it later; have to go to work!

cheers.
45
Vote
   


A great historical fact we're seeing these days, where Hegel's dialectic is being applyed to the American system. As The Economist tries to explain why they agree with state's intervention as an "expetion" to save free economy (it means, save men from themselves) we see the state as some not human, as some kind of external entity that we don't understand.

I don't know where they got their notion of state, but it seems to be the same interpretation that americans have. The state is somthing that imposes you taxes and block development.

To remind some basics on the matter: the state is the reflection of the people, it is elected, paied and thus controled by the people. That's why we all should vote, i remember you all that never care for elections.

So this times are great, and thesis-antithesis-sinthesys is being applied to all the people that thought "freedom" meant doing no matter what. Freedom is important, but you have to remember that your freedom have to pass the same "universality" test (in Kant's way of thinking ethics) as anything else. And the state (thus the society, the people) is here to garantee that you're not abusing of your freedom.

As most market people do, i'll try some futurology on the matter. Anyway, if i'm wrong all i need to do is write another post contradicting myself.. I'd say that in some 10 years we'll have a more educated American society, that will have discovered what the state is and that will have a health care system as good as french.

As we walk towards the "inevitability" of Marx's system..

cheers, have a nice weekend.
40
Vote
   


Welcome to 1984

August 27th 2008 07:22
6 months ago the US/EU were defending Kosovos independence, while russians were claiming it was against i dont know which international law. Now its the exact oposite for Ossetia.
Do you still think their real reasons are based on "international rights"?
They must think were all stupid. For my side i think theyre clowns


[ Click here to read more ]
59
Vote
   


The Euston Manifesto

March 6th 2008 22:40
Hi all, this one is quick.

This Manifesto was created 2006, by left wing people from UK mainly. It defends democratic and egalitarian aspects in politics, and i think it has quite a few good things written on it. I signed it myself, and i invite you to take a look on it


[ Click here to read more ]
168
Vote
   


On globalization

February 13th 2008 14:11
Yes! in a philosophy blog we can talk about economy too...actually we can talk about anything, as long as it's not too boring.

So, quick reflection on globalization. In early 90's, when we started hearing about the term, most right wing liberals liked it, and so did developped countries. Curious, they didn't see the results it would bring


[ Click here to read more ]
86
Vote
   


Hey all,

this one will be quite controversial


[ Click here to read more ]
71
Vote
   


I think the world is finally discovering that discussing "top-down" politial-social-economical systems is worthless, so i think we can skip this step, for the sake of some fresh air.

For society (and most important, people) to evolve, the fundamental step is on the individual, not on the system. The system is completely dependend on the people, so why do we think about the big picture if we cant even focus on the small one


[ Click here to read more ]
47
Vote
   


"Si hay govierno, soy contra"

July 29th 2007 17:20
Hey all,

nice moto for another post on societies. This one is just to criticise some of the ways people think are best for us nowadays


[ Click here to read more ]
37
Vote
   


Hey all,

so, continuing the matter started in this post. I wanted to explain and separate the formation of governments following the education of their people


[ Click here to read more ]
60
Vote
   


Sorry, it's not only about this...

July 17th 2007 16:39
A discussion with a friend these last days made me write this post. It's about education, the way i think we should define it.

People tend to think education as being the things "we learn in school". Maybe some people can add family on this group too, and this is it. Education is going to school and listening to your parents


[ Click here to read more ]
47
Vote
   


And so what?

June 22nd 2007 12:11
Hey all.

Getting togheter the conclusions of the 2 last posts. In the first, we talk about the importance of merit to any society. In the second, the value of equality to it


[ Click here to read more ]
37
Vote
   


So, on equality.

The way of seeing things can be defined as this: "all men should be treated as equal". The result of this is most of the times interpreted as "we should split the richness equally among people", even if they did not contributed for it in the same way


[ Click here to read more ]
36
Vote
   


So, on merit.

As explained in the last post, in any society it has to be decided how the merit of one's work will be rewarded in relation to the rest


[ Click here to read more ]
38
Vote
   


Hey all,

this is a little analisys of our society systems (political-economical-social systems) being applied nowadays in the world. In the point of view of these posts they can all be placed in the middle of 2 base systems of society, one based on merit, the other based on equality


[ Click here to read more ]
58
Vote
   


Moderated by Uula Limanski
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]