"Eigen-facts" and balance
October 12th 2007 17:06
Maths mate, if you don't understand it, leave it.
Analysing "facts" as infinte dimension vectors and "real" as an infinte dimension space has already been discused in this blog. Also, seeing "interpretation" as a linear transform being applied to the "facts" in "real" is 6 months old by now. You can take a look at it here.
I've been wondering what would eigenvectors become in this approach. I have no big interpretations, but some things are quite clear.
Eigenvectors of a linear transform can be seeing as the "perfect interpretation" of a fact. I mean perfect because this interpretation has no distortion of the fact applied to it. I mean, you don't have the problem of loosing information and misinterpretation, because the result vector of the "interpreted fact" has the same characteristics of the fact in "real".
Following the conclusions of quantic physics, spetially from Schrodinger's equation, the state where the interpretation of "facts" generate "eigen-facts" is the state of balance of the system. Thus, the state of balance for the person, the owner of the "transform" being applied to the vectors around.
It is not a conclusion that i like, but i've got to it. It means that balance is achieved when the person interprets "real" the more harmonious way possible. Notice, for a certain "linear transform" - for a certain mind - there are not infinite eigenvectors. Thus, to achieve balance you have to achieve the facts that you interpret the best.
Problem: your "linear transform" (your "internal base", your mind) evolves in time, thanks to reason (seeing it as Schopenhauer). Thus balance has to evolve in time too. Clearly, your lind evolves more when you are young thus balance tends to achieve an stationary state when you get older, because your mind changes less.
if you got here and understood it all, thank you. cheers, have a nice weekend.
Analysing "facts" as infinte dimension vectors and "real" as an infinte dimension space has already been discused in this blog. Also, seeing "interpretation" as a linear transform being applied to the "facts" in "real" is 6 months old by now. You can take a look at it here.
I've been wondering what would eigenvectors become in this approach. I have no big interpretations, but some things are quite clear.
Eigenvectors of a linear transform can be seeing as the "perfect interpretation" of a fact. I mean perfect because this interpretation has no distortion of the fact applied to it. I mean, you don't have the problem of loosing information and misinterpretation, because the result vector of the "interpreted fact" has the same characteristics of the fact in "real".
Following the conclusions of quantic physics, spetially from Schrodinger's equation, the state where the interpretation of "facts" generate "eigen-facts" is the state of balance of the system. Thus, the state of balance for the person, the owner of the "transform" being applied to the vectors around.
It is not a conclusion that i like, but i've got to it. It means that balance is achieved when the person interprets "real" the more harmonious way possible. Notice, for a certain "linear transform" - for a certain mind - there are not infinite eigenvectors. Thus, to achieve balance you have to achieve the facts that you interpret the best.
Problem: your "linear transform" (your "internal base", your mind) evolves in time, thanks to reason (seeing it as Schopenhauer). Thus balance has to evolve in time too. Clearly, your lind evolves more when you are young thus balance tends to achieve an stationary state when you get older, because your mind changes less.
if you got here and understood it all, thank you. cheers, have a nice weekend.
| 30 |
| Vote |
Subscribe to this blog
